An Insight into Swadharma
In short, rajasik and tamasik actions are to be
renounced
without
exception
and sattvik actions that come to us in the
natural course should be done, even if they
have some flaws in them. Let them be
defective. If you try to avoid their defects,
other defects will overtake you. If your nose
is crooked, let it be so. If you attempt to cut it
to make it beautiful, it will look more frightful.
You should be what you are; trying to do
something unnatural would invite
trouble. Sattvik actions may be defective, but
as they come to us in the natural course, they
should be done; only their fruit should be
renounced.
There is one more thing to say. You must not
take up the karma that has not come to you in
the natural course, even if you feel that you
could do it quite excellently. Do only what has
come to you in the natural course. Do not go
out of the way to take on new tasks which are
not naturally yours. Avoid the work which
needs a lot of deliberate efforts to build it up,
even though it appears attractive. Do not be
tempted by it; for, renunciation of fruit is
possible only in the case of the karma that comes
to you in the natural course. If a man begins
to run after each and every karma, imagining
that ‘this is good and that also is good’,
renunciation of fruit is inconceivable. This will
result in nothing but making a mess of one’s
life. It is with the desire of having its fruit
that one will do the karma that one is not duty-
bound to do, and still the fruit will elude him.
Life will then always be unsteady and
unsettled. The mind will get attached to
that karma. Even if sattvik karma is found
tempting, one should keep away from that
temptation. If you try to pursue a variety
of sattvik karma, rajas and tamas will creep into
them. You must therefore restrict yourself to
the sattvik karma which comes to you as your
natural swadharma.
Swadharma is
comprised
of swadeshi
[1]dharma, swajateeya dharma (duties arising
out of one’s being a part of a particular
community) and swakaleen dharma (duties
appropriate for the time). These three together
constitute swadharma. While deciding about
one’s swadharma, one is required to take into
account what is appropriate to one’s nature
and tendencies and what the duties that have
fallen to him are. You have something in you
which makes you what you are. That is why
you are different from others. Everybody has
something that is distinctively his own. A goat
can develop itself as a goat; if it aspires to be
a cow, it is impossible. It can never give up its
‘goatness’. To give up the ‘goatness’ it will
have to give up its body; it will have to die to
take a new body and acquire a new dharma. In
the present birth, that ‘goatness’ alone is sacred
for it. You must be knowing the story of the
bull and the frog. There is a limit beyond
which a frog cannot inflate its body. It will
die if it tries to become as big as a bull. It is
not right to imitate others. That is why it is
said that taking up another’s dharma is
disastrous.
Swadharma consists of two parts; one changes
while the other does not. I am not today what
I was yesterday, nor shall I be tomorrow what
I am today. I am changing continually. A
child’s swadharma is to seek all-round
development. A young man’s swadharma is to
use his abundant energy for the service of
society. Swadharma of a mature adult man is
to give others the benefit of his wisdom. A
part of swadharma thus changes, but the other
part remains unchanged. To use the language
of the scriptures, we may say that a man
has varnadharma (duties that follow from being
in a particular varna) as well as ashram- dharma
[2] (duties that follow from being in a
particular ashram); and that varnadharma does
not change while ashramdharma changes.
‘Ashramdharma changes’ - What does this
mean? When we successfully pass the stage
of brahmacharyashram, we enter the next stage—
become a grihasth (the householder)—, then
enter vanaprasthashram and finally become
a sannyasi. But varnadharma does not change.
I can never go beyond my natural limits. Any
attempt to do so will be foolish. You cannot
overlook your distinctive attributes and
personality. The scheme of varnadharma is
based on this idea. The concept
of varnadharma is
quite
appealing.
Is varnadharma absolutely unchangeable? Is
belonging to a varna akin to belonging to a
species? Is it that just as a goat will always be
a goat, a Brahmin will always be a Brahmin? I
concede that it is not so; one should take a
balanced view. When varnadharma is used as
an ingenuous arrangement for social order,
exceptions are inevitable. The Gita has
acknowledged this.
The key point is that one should understand
these two types of dharma and keep away from
any other dharma, even if it appears beautiful
and alluring.
The full Meaning of the Renunciation of Fruit
From the elaboration of the idea of the
renunciation of fruit of actions the following
points emerge:
1. Rajasik and tamasik karma should be
completely given up.
2. The fruit of the action of that renunciation
should also be renounced. There must not
be any pride or vanity about it.
3. Sattvik karma should not itself be
renounced, but its fruit should be
renounced.
4. Sattvik karma, whose fruit is to be
renounced, should be done even if it has
some impurities in it.
5. When such karma is done continually, the
mind will get purified. Activity will go on
becoming gentler and subtler, and will
cease completely in the end.
6. Activity will disappear; but actions for the
sake of loksamgraha—to bring the people
together and show them the path of
righteousness—will continue.
7. Only that sattvik karma should be done
which comes to us in the natural
course. One should keep away from
other karma, howsoever good it may
appear. One should not be tempted by
it.
8. Swadharma that comes to us naturally
consists of two parts. One is subject to
change
and
the
other
is
not. Varnadharma does not change, while
the ashramdharma keeps changing. The part
of swadharma that is subject to change must
change. That will ensure purity and avoid
stagnation.
If a stream stops flowing and water stagnates,
it begins to stink. Similar is the case with
ashramdharma. A man first accepts family life.
He submits to the restraints of family for the
sake of his growth. There he gets different
experiences. But if he remains bound there
permanently, it will spell his doom. The
family-life, which was his dharma at one stage,
becomes adharma (irreligion) at a later stage,
as it then becomes binding. If the changing
part of the dharma is not given up in time
because of attachment, the result is disastrous.
There should not be attachment even to a good
thing. Attachment inevitably leads to terrible
consequences. Germs of tuberculosis may
enter the lungs unawares, but they will
nevertheless eat away the whole of our life.
If, through our carelessness, the germs of
attachment enter into sattvik karma, that will
then result in the rotting of swadharma.
The sattvik swadharma will then degenerate
into rajas and tamas. The part of swadharma that
ought to change must be left behind at the
appropriate time. This is true for the dharma about
family as well as the dharma about nation. If
attachment creeps into patriotism, it will
degenerate into dangerous chauvinism. That will
halt development. Attachment will corrupt the
mind and cause degeneration.
Fulfillment is nothing but the culmination
of Sadhana
In short, if you aspire for the fulfillment of
your life, you should seek and catch hold of
the principle of the renunciation of fruit of
actions which will free you from all worries.
It would show you the right path. This
principle also tells us the bounds within which
to act. When we have this guiding light with
us, we shall know what to do, what to
discard, what to change and when, and so on.
But now let us consider something different.
Should the spiritual seeker have his attention
riveted on the ultimate state marked by the
complete cessation of activities?
Ajnani continues to act without doing any
activity. Should a seeker have this aim in mind?
No. Here too, the principle of renunciation of
the fruit should be applied. Our life is so
wonderfully fashioned that we would get
what we want even without paying any
attention to it. Moksha (the state of oneness
with the Supreme) is the highest fulfillment
of life. But one must not be greedy even
for moksha, or the state of akarma. That state
would be reached without one being aware
of it. Sannyasa is not something that can
happen at some particular moment. It is not
something mechanical. You will not even
notice how it grows in your life. Let us not
therefore worry about moksha.
A bhakta always says to the Lord, ”Bhakti is
enough for me. I do not have desire for moksha,
the ultimate fruit of sadhana.” After
all, moksha too is a kind of fruit—something
that is to be enjoyed—and it too must be
renounced. But when we renounce moksha, it
will not move away from us; rather, attainment
of moksha will become more certain. When you
give up the hope of attaining moksha, you will
advance towards it without your being aware
of it. Let sadhana be done with such single-
minded dedication that there is no thought
of moksha in the mind; then moksha itself will
seek you on its own accord. Let the seeker be
totally immersed in his sadhana. The Lord had
already said, ‘Ma te sangostvakarmani’ (‘You
should not covet the state of akarma,
or moksha’). Now He is again saying in the end,
‘Aham tva sarvapapebhyo mokshishyami ma
shuchah’ (‘I shall release you from all sins; be
not grieved.’) [3] —‘I, the bestower of moksha is
here; forget about moksha and be concerned
about your sadhana.’ Sadhana will attain
perfection when you forget moksha, and
then moksha will itself be attracted to
you. Moksha-Lakshmi garlands him who is not
concerned about her and is fully absorbed in
his sadhana without any thought of moksha in
his mind. [4] When sadhana reaches its zenith,
the moment of fulfillment comes. If a man in a
forest wants to reach home, but just keeps
sitting under a tree in the forest, chanting
‘home, home’ all the while, the home will
remain away. If he succumbs to the temptation
of rest, he will miss the ultimate rest. He
should keep on walking; eventually he will
find his home right in front of him. If I lose
myself in dreaming about moksha and relax,
slacken my sadhana, moksha will remain
distant. The surest way to attain moksha is to
fling away any aspiration for it and
concentrate on sadhana. One must not hanker
after the ultimate rest, after the state of akarma.
Be fully absorbed in your sadhana, stick to it
with love and then moksha will be yours
without fail. You cannot solve a problem by
shouting for the answer; you should rather
stick to the correct method and that will step
by step lead you to the answer. How can you
reach the end before the completion of the
process? How can you have an answer
without following the method fully? How can
you attain the state of liberation when you are
still a seeker? When one is struggling for life
in a flooded river, will it do if he thinks of the
pleasures awaiting him on the other bank? At
that time, all the attention should be riveted
on swimming, all the strength should be
applied to inch towards the other
bank. Sadhana should be carried to the end;
the river should be crossed, and you will
find moksha there waiting for you.
Write Your Comments Here: